[mou] Comments on MOURC, long
Laura Erickson
lauraerickson@abac.com
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:28:52 -0600
Mike is absolutely right that birding is just a hobby. Ornithology is a
science. And if MOURC is to live up to its name, it needs to reflect
science, not the hobby of birding. Right now, as has been stated before, a
rare bird's status is more reflective of how easy it is for a birder to
find it than whether the bird is reliably present in the state.
This is a complex problem, though. Because when it comes right down to it,
birders are the only ones reliably looking for each species. I think there
should be a status other than "accidental" for a species like King Rail
that very well may be hiding out waiting for someone to find it--a species
that is recorded nesting in neighboring states. Giving King Rail and
Ross's Gull the same "accidental" designation makes that designation less
meaningful except as it indicates how lucky a birder is to see it.
Laura Erickson
Duluth, MN
Producer, "For the Birds" radio program
<http://www.lauraerickson.com/>
There is symbolic as well as actual beauty in the migration of
birds. There is something infinitely healing in the repeated refrains of
nature--the assurance that dawn comes after night, and spring after the winter.
--Rachel Carson