[mou] Lark Bunting WAS Refound

[birder-birding5331@mailblocks.com]

Sorry about the mix up I didn't change the subject, but I did find the 
Lark Bunting at the times I said on Thursday morning.

I checked again last night about 7:30 - 8:00. I didn't find Lark 
Bunting right away, Brian Smith met me down there and he didn't see 
Lark Bunting either. Right after he left the Lark Bunting showed up 
singing in that dead tree.

If anybody wants help to locate the tree, call me at home: (507) 
723-6615. Make sure everyone brings insect repellent.

Nathan Wersal
Springfield
Brown County


-----Original Message-----
From: Catherine Clayton <KittyAnne@worldnet.att.net>
To: birder-birding5331@mailblocks.com
Sent: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:54:21 -0500
Subject: Re: [mnbird] Re: [mou] Lark Bunting Not Refound

Hi Nathan, I'm confused. You said in your subject heading that the lark
bunting was not refound, then you state that you refound the bird. Which
is it? Are you still seeing the bunting? I am hoping Sunday to drive 
down
that way and see the bird if it is still in the area. Good bird!

Thanks,

Cathy Clayton
Lake Elmo
"When the bird and the book disagree, always believe the bird."
----- Original Message -----
From: <birder-birding5331@mailblocks.com>
To: <brsmith@sleepyeyetel.net>; <mou-net@cbs.umn.edu>;
<mnbird@lists.mnbird.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: [mnbird] Re: [mou] Lark Bunting Not Refound


> I refound the Lark Bunting this morning in the same tree about 8:30 AM
> and again at 9:15 AM. The first time I seen it, it just started to fly
> from its perch towards the road. The second time I seen it, it glided
> into a corn field north of the path.
> It sang at the second sighting. Its song goes something like this: 
"chi
> chi - chi chi chi - ti ti ti ti t" (the dashes are pauses).
>
> Nathan Wersal
> Springfield
> Brown County
>
>

----------------------------------------------
Mailblocks - A Better Way to Do Email
http://about.mailblocks.com/info