[mou] Birding Ethics
Jim Williams
two-jays@att.net
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:22:42 -0600
This is a forward from the Wisconsin Birding Network, where ethics of
birders and bird photographers (re. owls) also is under discussion.
Bettie Harriman below makes reference to comments from the web site of
the North American Nature Photographers Association.
I would like to add one comment: Some of us do seem to have great
concern about the length or size of the lenses used by some
photographers. Long lenses seem to be regarded by some people as
symbols of bad behavior, like a scarlet letter sewn to our jackets. I
work with a 500mm lens. (Given the camera mechanics, I am shooting, in
effect, at 750mm.) With the sun shield on the end of the lens, it
indeed looks long. There are many reasons why I own and use this piece
of equipment. One reason is, it lets me get high-quality images from a
greater distance. I do not need to be on top of the bird to get the
photos I seek. I suspect this is the case for many of us who work with
telephoto equipment.
Jim Williams
Wayzata
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bettie R. Harriman" <bettie@vbe.com>
Date: March 10, 2005 8:34:06 AM CST
To: "Wisconsin Birding Network" <wisbirdn@lawrence.edu>
Subject: [wisb] Birding Ethics
Tom Sykes wrote: Unfortunately WSO and ABA don't have clear guidelines
about bird
photographers.
I can tell you that both have been asked to look into it and prehaps
add to the Code or take other actions of some nature. I know the ABA
CEO has contacted the North American Nature Photographers Association.
They have a pretty strong ethics statement on their website.
<http://www.nanpa.org/committees/ethics/>
Current wording on the WSO Code of Ethics says, in part:
When birding, we should act in ways that do not endanger the welfare of
birds and other wildlife. We should:
Observe and photograph the birds without disturbing them in significant
ways.
Avoid chasing or repeatedly flushing birds.
....
Stay on existing roads, trails, and pathways whenever possible ...
I know this leaves the question of what are "in significant ways" up to
each birder, but if you have to question yourself about your intended
behavior, then that's a good clue that it's NOT what you should do.
Bettie Harriman
Oshkosh
##############################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <wisbirdn@lawrence.edu>.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, E-mail to <wisbirdn-off@lawrence.edu>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <wisbirdn-digest@lawrence.edu>
Send administrative QUERIES, E-mail to <wisbirdn-request@lawrence.edu>