[mou] Another example of what happens when an owl location is posted on the internet....or: Fw: [Birdtalk] FW: [IBLE] Hawk Owl, Northern Shrike - ETHICS...
Richard Wood
rwoodphd at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 27 09:04:16 CST 2007
Hi all,
Here's another example of what a circus the posting of an owl's location becomes....
Richard
Richard L. Wood, Ph. D.
Hastings, MN
rwoodphd at yahoo.com
----- Forwarded Message ----
Message
Following are several very
disturbing posts from IBLE describing the recent highly unethical behavior of a
few birders and photogs watching/shooting the visiting Northern Hawk
Owl near Rexburg, ID. Deliberately causing this bird to fly just
to get flight shots is unacceptable. It is trying to survive the winter
months far from its natural home and needs all its energy to remain warm and
obtain food in freezing temperatures.
I sincerely hope there won't be
any future occurrences of this inconsiderate, stressful behavior. The
unfortunate result might be that it would become necessary to exclude sightings
of rare northern raptors from publication on the bird forums (as was done
for the Snowy Owl that visited Utah several years ago).
Jim
From: ible at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ible at yahoogroups.com]
Darren, Chad, IBLE, et. al.
I agree with what's been written about over-enthusiastic birders, but the
behavior that Chad observed is totally unethical and unacceptable. I too feel
partially responsible as I was the one who "leaked" it to the Pocatello press. I
should've asked the newspaper reporter to include a paragraph about birding
ethics to discourage the aforementioned behaviors. I don't know it it'll do any
good, but I'll ask him to publish a follow-up including such verbiage.
Sorry folks!
Dave Mead
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Darren Clark wrote:
Chad and IBLE,
Thanks for sharing your
experience. I'm usually not one to get too up in arms about observers flushing
an occasional bird to get a better look, but the behavior you describe is
unethical, selfish, and perhaps immoral. I've been worried about the bird
crossing highway 33 on its own, it certainly doesn't need anybody flushing it
into traffic. I encouraged the Rexburg paper to run a story (written first by
the Pocatello paper) on the bird and now feel a bit responsible for some of
the "enthusiasm" shown the bird. I hope anybody who observes such behavior
towards the bird lets the people involved know how you feel.
To:
ible at yahoogroups.
com
On 11/23 I went to Beaver Dick
park to see the hawk owl. It was there, being photographed (harassed)
by three photographers who followed it from tree to tree, making owl
and rodent sounds and otherwise bothering it. It was neat to see the
owl, and to watch it hunt voles (very successful at that), but not
so neat to see the people chasing it around, including one young
person whose parents had the kid climb the tree the owl was in. One
photographer approached the owl in a tree as it landed next to Hwy 33,
causing it to fly out in the road, nearly
getting hit. Across Hwy 33, I observed the
owl for some time sitting on a telephone pole, where it was repeatedly
buzzed by a very light colored Northern Shrike. The owl didn't seem to
mind much, but the shrike was clearly agitated.
It's great to see the owl, but
people need to use a little common sense around the owl and other
people.
.
Thanks a lot folks. The reason I originally posted a
reminder to use caution and consider the welfare of the bird first is because I
watched someone walk right up to the bird and flush it, with camera pointed at
it, presumably to capture a flight shot. That person is well know and
highly regarded among birders and he knew better. When he realized that I
was there to look at the bird he apologized, saying that he didn't realize I was
a birder. Would it have been OK if no one had seen him? It's not
about the birders and I don't care about my lost opportunity to view the bird on
an advantageous perch. I was concerned about the bird being constantly
harassed. Maybe that point wasn't made obvious enough? It's not
about someone not seeing the bird it's about protecting the owl. I was
disappointed that this sighting got posted in a public forum in the first place
but it was already too late at that point. Owls generate a huge amount of
interest as evidenced by the fact that someone has seen this individual almost
every day since it was first reported more than two weeks ago, and the four or
five carloads of birders every weekend for two months looking for the Rexburg
Snowy Owls. If only one or two people went to see it flushing it wouldn't
be that big a deal for the bird (just for the record I wouldn't flush it on
purpose then either). But with all the pressure this bird is receiving
it's a whole different story. Can we afford to continue to flush this bird
over and over? Just for a stupid photograph? I too enjoy taking
photos of birds so I understand the desire to get close. But that's not a
good reason, in my opinion, to flush a wintering bird like this over and
over. And what really pisses me off is that this bird is exceedingly
cooperative. You can get very close and capture excellent photos, even
with point and shoot digital cameras, so there's no need to push the bird to the
point where it flushes. If you want a flight shot that badly then just
wait for the bird to fly on its own. Let's use a little common sense and
let this bird do its thing without unnecessary interference from us.
I propose that we collect names (or make/model of car and license
plate-someone will know who it is) from people exhibiting such behavior and post
them on this forum so everyone knows who not to tell about vulnerable birds in
the future. I'll bet the same people that cause these problems by showing
a total disregard for the welfare of the bird will be the first ones to bitch
when they find out about the next Snowy or Hawk-Owl long after it's left the
area.
Richard L. Wood, Ph. D.
Hastings, MN
rwoodphd at yahoo.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://moumn.org/pipermail/mou-net_moumn.org/attachments/20071127/da48e38d/attachment-0001.html
More information about the mou-net
mailing list