[mou] WEVI tape discussion
douglas chapman
rhameprairie at sio.midco.net
Tue Jul 29 08:41:40 CDT 2008
Well said.
The Cassin's Sparrows which have been found (and confirmed breeding)
here in South Dakota have not been posted for this reason. It's a bit
too bad, but understandable since even the ABA magazine "Birding" now
calls bird finding a "sport."
It seems that tapes are our steroids.
Doug Chapman
Sioux Falls, SD
On Jul 29, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Richard Wood wrote:
> It seems to me that this discussion took place last year about the
> Yellow-breasted Chat that was at Black Dog Lake, and at the time, I
> wondered what was the point of everyone getting all upset, because
> it's just going to happen again.
>
> The fact is, it's "human nature" for people to act the way that they
> do. People are going to want to see a bird that is "rare" when it's
> posted, and some of them are going to take any means necessary to
> see it, whether it be to drive their vehicle where they shouldn't
> (which happened in Maryland recently) or to play tapes, or to throw
> a rock at a rail and kill it.
>
> I wish we could put an end to this, "we can end this behavior if
> enough of us post ethics "rules"", because it just isn't going to
> stop someone from seeing a bird once it has been posted. As I told
> a person in Maryland last year that was complaining about birders
> turning the location of a pair of Long-eared Owls into a circus, "if
> the original poster didn't want it to come to this, he shouldn't
> have posted the bird's location". Maybe we should do that instead
> of citing "birding ethics" and then having everyone and his brother
> posting asking us to "go by the rules"? In my almost 10 years as a
> birder, I've seen that asking others to "go by the rules" doesn't
> work. It doesn't work in other parts of life, so why do we think it
> will work here?
>
> Richard
>
> Richard L. Wood, Ph. D.
> Hastings, MN
> rwoodphd at yahoo.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Diana Doyle <diana at managingthewaterway.com>
> To: mattjim at earthlink.net; mou-net at moumn.org; mnbird at lists.mnbird.net
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:22:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [mou] WEVI tape discussion
>
> Are birders also destined to fall victim to Garrett Hardin's tragedy
> of the commons? It would seem that there is no such thing as "little
> tape playing" when it is multiplied over all the birders who want to
> see a particular bird.
>
> I agree with Jim. It's a disservice to the bird and to the person
> who then regrets sharing their excitement of an unusual bird with
> the broader birding community.
>
> We must ask ourselves what our priorities are--if we are first and
> foremost advocates for birds, their well-being, and their habitat.
> Ultimately that's what being a birder is all about.
>
> Diana Doyle
> S. Minneapolis
>
> -------------
>
> On Jul 28, 2008, at 16:09 , James Mattsson wrote:
>
> THIS IS A RARE BIRD THAT IS ON TERRITORY WHERE MANY BIRDERS HAVE A
> CHANCE TO HEAR AND SEE IT !!!! TAPES SHOULD NOT BE USED
> "SPARINGLY" OR ANY OTHER WAY !! TAPES CAN ONLY BE HARMFUL TO THE
> BIRD WHICH MIGHT BE MATED (PREDATION, ENERGY USED TO DEFEND AGAINST
> NON-EXISTENT NEIGHBORS, ETC), AND MAY PRECLUDE OTHER BIRDERS FROM
> SEEING/HEARING THE BIRD.
>
> THIS IS WHY I NO LONGER POST BIRDS I FIND THAT I FEEL THAT ARE
> SUSCEPTIBLE TO TAPE PLAYING.
>
> HERE IS THE COMPLETE ABA CODE OF ETHICS.
>
> http://www.americanbirding.org/abaethics.htm
>
> Jim
>
>
> ---
> This mailing list is sponsored by the Minnesota Ornithologists'
> Union. Mailing list membership available on-line at http://moumn.org/subscribe.html
> .
> -----
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to mou-net-request at moumn.org with
> a subject of unsubscribe.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://moumn.org/pipermail/mou-net_moumn.org/attachments/20080729/f60e28af/attachment.html
More information about the mou-net
mailing list