forts by the NWP to re-establish nesting
Common Terns on Fish Lake.
Methods
In the summer of 1991, we conducted a
survey of five islands in Fish Lake for their
suitability as potential Common Tern nest-
ing sites. Of the five, three were selected
and ranked; that fall, I met with representa-
tives of Minnesota Power and they gra-
ciously granted permission to the NWP to
create nesting habitat for Common Terns,
on the island which was ranked highest.
The forest on the two acre island would
best be classified as an aspen-birch-balsam
fir type. Infertile soils and a closed tree
canopy resulted in little forest floor vegeta-
tion. Overnight camping and picnicking has
left both ends of the island grassy and open.
In the winter of 1991-92, a Minnesota
Conservation Corps crew removed trash and
cut down all trees and brush on the island.
The tops of the trees and the brush were
cut, piled, and burned, and the larger logs
were taken to a nearby island for use by
summer visitors. Thirty tern decoys were
set out to attract terns, and " No Trespass-
ing " signs were erected to inform people
that this area was for nesting terns. The is-
land was sprayed with Rodeo herbicide
(Monsanto Corp.) to prevent regrowth of
vegetation and to kill the grasses and forbs.
Results
A large group of terns was first seen us-
ing the lake on 21 May 1992. On 24 May,
terns were seen around the island, and on
26 May 18 adults were seen on the island.
On 17 July I approached the island and saw
about 20 adults flying around and, upon
closer inspection, found five nests. On 29
July I found three fledged young, three
young that were still unable to fly, and two
nests that contained eggs. It appears five to
ten breeding pairs used the island this sum-
mer.
Discussion
It was rewarding to have Common Terns
nest successfully the first year, but the is-
land will require continued management.
With the overstory removed, vegetation be-
came very heavy by the end of the summer.
Rodeo herbicide should be applied in north-
ern Minnesota in June; however, the birds
32
return in late May which prevents the effec-
tive use of Rodeo and necessitates the evalu-
ation of alternative herbicides. This fall the
two ends of the island that had grass were
tilled, which may reduce the need for herbi-
cide treatment. Future management will be
to control encroaching vegetation, and moni-
tor tern numbers.
The future for Common Tern use of Fish
Lake Reservoir looks good, and with proper
management the island should accommodate
a population of 50-100 breeding pairs. Com-
pared to other tern management projects, the
Fish Lake project was an inexpensive en-
deavor. I believe there may be other areas
within common tern breeding range in the
state where the same techniques may be
used. Areas where Common Terns are
known to nest or have nested historically
should be evaluated for further opportuni-
ties to create suitable habitat.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the people at Min-
nesota Power, especially Bob Bohm for al-
lowing us to use their land. Without their
generosity this rare bird would have one less
place to nest. To Rich Staffon and his staff
at the Cloquet wildlife office for the help
they provided in getting the island ready.
Thanks to Bill Berg, Rich Baker, and Jack
Mooty for reviewing an earlier draft of this
manuscript. A special vote of thanks goes
out to Jack Mooty who has given me the
freedom to work on projects that I believe
in, and is always there to provide me with
encouragement and advice.
Literature Cited
Coffin, B. and L. Pfannmuller, (eds.).
Minnesota's Endangered Flora and Fauna,
University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis, 1988.
Courtney, P.A. and H. Blokpoel.,
"Distribution and Numbers of Common
Terns on the Lower Great Lakes During
1900-1980: a Review," Colonial
Waterbirds. 1983:6: pp. 107-120.
McKearnan, J.E. and F.J. Cuthbert, " Status
and Breeding Success of Common Terns
in Minnesota," Colonial Waterbirds.
1989:12: pp. 185-190.
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, 1201 East Highway 2, Grand
Rapids, MN 55744
The Loon Vol. 65