Proceedings of the Minnesota Ornithological
Records Committee
Kim R. Eckert
T here was a meeting of the Committee
on 5 December 1993, and, among the
items on the agenda, the following deci-
sions were reached:
• It was decided to proceed with the
publication of the Checklist of the Birds of
Minnesota without waiting for the publica-
tion of the seventh edition of the American
Ornithologists' Union's checklist, tenta-
tively scheduled for later in 1994.
The Minnesota list was distributed with
the Winter 1993 issue of The Loon, and it
uses the nomenclature, sequence, and tax-
onomy of the sixth edition of the A.O.U.
checklist and its supplements. One of these
supplements, the 39th, scheduled for publi-
cation in the July 1993 issue of The Auk,
includes three name changes affecting the
Minnesota list:
Green-backed Heron
becomes
Green Heron
Lesser Golden-Plover
becomes
American Golden-Plover
Rosy Finch
becomes
Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch.
(Also note that one error appears in the
new Minnesota Checklist: an asterisk indi-
cating a confirmed breeding record was in-
cluded for Kentucky Warbler; however, the
Committee has not yet accepted any breed-
ing records for this species.)
• Because of the delay in producing the
new Minnesota checklist (normally, it
would have appeared with the Spring 1993
issue of The Loon) , it was necessary to dis-
cuss the status of two species whose situa-
tion had changed since the December 1992
meeting of the Committee (see The Loon
65:33). Accordingly, it was decided to keep
Ruff on the Casual list; and Burrowing Owl,
formerly Regular, is now considered Ca-
sual.
• It was decided that votes on recircu-
lated records and on potential first state
records will no longer be taken by mail as
other records are; these will now be held for
discussion and vote at the next meeting of
the Committee.
• A Common Ground-Dove record from
Duluth on 16 October 1993 was discussed
and found Acceptable as a first state record
on a 10-0 vote.
• A second Black-shouldered Kite (now
White-tailed Kite) record from Blooming-
ton on 7 May 1993 (also see The Loon
65:147) was discussed and found Unaccept-
able on a 1-9 vote. Although the description
was convincing enough to be accepted by a
majority of the Committee on earlier votes,
it was decided that a first state record
should have more complete documentation.
There was no description of the dorsal sur-
face of the bird, its relative size was un-
clear, and the distance of the bird from the
observer was not given.
• A photograph record of a possible
Barn Owl from Shorewood, Hennepin Co.
on 9 September 1993 was discussed and
found Unacceptable on a 0-7 vote. The
Spring 1994
43