[mou] Fwd: Ornithologists in the (bad) news
Jim Williams
two-jays@att.net
Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:40:06 -0500
Forward by Jim Williams
Wayzata, Minnesota
Begin forwarded message:
Ellen Paul
Executive Director
The Ornithological Council
Mailto:ellen.paul@verizon.net
Ornithological Council Website: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/BIRDNET
"Providing Scientific Information about Birds"
From the New York Times, 25 July 2006.
July 25, 2006
Study of Songbirds Finds High Levels of Mercury
By ANTHONY DePALMA
A biologist studying wild songbirds in New York State
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/national/
usstatesterritoriesandpossessions/newyork/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>
has found that all 178 woodland birds he tested last year had unusually
high levels of mercury in their blood and feathers, a sign that the
toxic chemical has spread farther in the environment than previously
thought.
The biologist, David C. Evers, who is also executive director of the
Biodiversity Research Institute, a nonprofit ecological organization in
Gorham, Me., said that his preliminary findings challenged existing
perceptions about how far mercury travels, how it interacts with the
environment and how it affects various forms of wildlife -- all with
worrisome implications for people.
While mercury has often been found in lakes and streams and in fish,
Dr. Evers's work documents the unexpected presence of the chemical in
birds that do not live on water and never eat fish.
"Impacts on biological diversity usually show impacts on human health,"
Dr. Evers said in a telephone interview. "If these birds are having
trouble, that should be a very good indicator of a risk to our own
well-being and health as well."
Catherine H. Bowes, Northeast mercury program manager for the National
Wildlife Federation, called the results of the songbird study "eye
opening" and said they helped expand understanding of mercury
contamination.
"It makes a compelling case for reducing mercury pollution from local
sources, as New York is doing," Ms. Bowes said.
In May, Gov. George E. Pataki
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/
george_e_pataki/index.html?inline=nyt-per> proposed cutting mercury
emissions from New York power plants in half by 2010, setting standards
that would be substantially more stringent than new federal regulations
on mercury. State environmental officials are drawing up regulations,
and then will take public comments before adopting them.
The National Wildlife Federation will include Dr. Evers's study in a
national report later this summer. The study will also be formally
presented at an international conference on mercury pollution scheduled
for Madison, Wis., next month.
The songbird study provides a broader assessment of the mercury hazard
in wooded areas of New York and throughout the northeastern United
States than has previously been conducted.
The presence of mercury in lakes and streams is already well
documented, and the New York Department of Health advises people to
restrict the consumption of any freshwater fish caught in most of the
state to no more than one meal a week.
But Dr. Evers is one of the first scientists to test for wildlife
mercury contamination beyond fish. He began his work in this area in
1998 and found that common loons, which eat fish, had highly elevated
levels of mercury that made them lethargic and caused their
reproductive rates to drop.
He then decided to study songbirds, which never eat fish. In
particular, he wanted to study the wood thrush, a small bird with a
distinctive song that was once common throughout the Northeast. The
population of wood thrushes has declined 45 percent in recent decades.
It was once thought that destruction of the bird's forest habitat was
responsible for the decline. But Dr. Evers now suspects that mercury
contamination might be a factor, along with the wide-ranging negative
effects of acid rain on the forests.
Last year the Nature Conservancy
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/n/
nature_conservancy/index.html?inline=nyt-org>, concerned about mercury
contamination in the Adirondacks and Catskills and its effect on the
ecosystem, commissioned Dr. Evers and the Biodiversity Institute to
undertake a pilot study in New York State. He netted songbirds at nine
sites, including areas near some of New York City's upstate reservoirs.
(Although the Department of Health fish advisory extends to the
reservoirs, regular sampling by city officials has not detected any
mercury in the water.)
Much of the mercury that is causing problems in New York comes from
coal-burning power plants, including those in Ohio and other states in
the Midwest. Smokestack emissions from those plants tend to drift
eastward. The airborne mercury eventually falls to earth, settling in
lakes and streams where it is transformed into methyl mercury, which is
toxic.
The chemical then enters the food chain through worms and tiny
creatures that live on lake bottoms. They are eaten by small fish,
which then become prey for larger fish. The amount of mercury is
magnified as it goes from smaller species to larger ones.
Dr. Evers's work suggests that when mercury falls on land, it is
absorbed by soil and by fallen leaves that are consumed by worms and
insects. Songbirds then feed on the bugs, absorbing the mercury.
While all the birds he tested last year had mercury in their blood,
wood thrushes had the most, Dr. Evers said, an average of 0.1 parts per
million. That is below the federal safe standard for fish (0.3 p.p.m.)
but high enough to affect the birds' reproductive cycle.
With fewer songbirds to eat potentially harmful insects, the state's
forests would be at greater risk for damage by gypsy moths and other
pests, Dr. Evers said.
Beyond that, mercury leaching into soil could find its way into the
food chain in ways that are still unknown, he said.
This summer, again with support from the Nature Conservancy and the
Biodiversity Research Institute, Dr. Evers has expanded his sampling
range to cover 33 sites in New York and across the Northeast.
"That starts to get us to the point where we can provide solid
scientific findings to public policymakers who will have to decide what
to do about mercury," he said.
The project has also taken blood samples this year from nesting bald
eagles.
Tim Tear, senior scientist and manager of the Nature Conservancy's
global conservation approach team, said that while last year's pilot
study did not provide conclusive evidence, it "certainly gives us
confidence that our early hypotheses" about the deposition of mercury
on land are correct, warranting further study.