[mou] Bird photo affirmations
Laura Erickson
bluejay@lauraerickson.com
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:36:01 -0600
I, too, am very impressed with a great many of the photos I've seen this
year. And I've seen some bad behavior by some birders and
photographers. But I don't think we should be too hasty to judge one
another. I'm VERY opposed to doing anything to rouse a sleeping Boreal
Owl--when they're wandering and don't have a cavity to spend the day in,
they're very vulnerable, and their open eyes are a dead giveaway to
chickadees and jays of their presence. But if they're actively hunting,
why do we instantly assume that nearby photographers are bothering
them? When a birder or photographer is very close to an owl, he or she has
often spent a long time creeping in, not bothering the owl at
all. Sometimes (and I've seen this happen more than once), a photographer
gets set up to take distant shots and owls have actually come closer to the
photographer. Someone driving by may make assumptions that aren't at all
fair.
I can be a real b*tch when it comes to protecting birds because I'd far
rather err on the side of a bird than a person any time. But the truth is,
northern owls are pretty tolerant, and when we're not rousing them or
luring them near roads or startling them so they fly across a road, I don't
object to people setting up and taking pictures, even if they've spent
their entire discretionary income on camera equipment. All this talk about
whose lens is longer than whose seems a bit unseemly to me. Can't we just
get along?
Laura Erickson
Duluth, MN
Producer, "For the Birds" radio program
<http://www.lauraerickson.com/>
There is symbolic as well as actual beauty in the migration of
birds. There is something infinitely healing in the repeated refrains of
nature--the assurance that dawn comes after night, and spring after the winter.
--Rachel Carson